0911111111

Influence of different sources of fishmeal on the egg yolk fatty acids profile and plasma lipids profile of layers

0 Comments

Sara. A. Mohamed1, M. A. Barri1, I.I. Hamid2 and S.M.E. Khojali1

Department of Biochemistry, Nutrition, Pharmacology and Toxicology

1Veterinary research Institute (VRI). Khartoum, Sudan.

2Animal Production Research Centre, Kuku, Khartoum North, Sudan.

Summary

This trial was conducted to find out the influence of the adding marine and River Nile fishmeal in conventional layers feed at two different rates 2 and 1% for each meal on egg yolk fatty acids profile and plasma lipids profile of layers. Hundred laying hens – (Hisex breed), 20 weeks old, were used in this study. Feeding of fishmeal to laying hens for two months showed significant effect on egg yolk content of poly unsaturated fatty acids. Fish meal had significantly reduced plasma total lipids, triglycerides, cholesterol and low density lipoproteins, while high density lipoprotein was raised.

Introduction

The egg is one of the best and least-expensive sources of high-quality protein and contains a balanced distribution of most vitamins and minerals in relation to its low calorie content. However, one large egg contains 220 mg cholesterol, making it one of the major sources of dietary cholesterol for humans. Dietary manipulation of the n-3 fatty acid content of laying hen rations results in the production of eggs containing substantial amount of n-3 fatty acids, whereas, attempts to modify whole-egg cholesterol content to meet demands of health conscious consumers have been largely unsuccessful (Mary E.Van elswyk, 1997). These n-3 fatty acids-enriched eggs may serve as an alternative to fish for these fatty acids and may have health benefits despite their unaltered cholesterol concentration. In fact moderate lowering of plasma triglycerides concentrations was observed in human subjects consuming eggs enriched in EPA and DHA from hens fed fish oil. Eggs high in alpha- linolenic acid have been produced by feeding hens ground Flaxseed. Although    less    pronounced    than   for    alpha-linolenic   acid,   the   DHA

concentration is also significantly increased in these eggs (Ferrier et al., 1995).

Over the past twenty years many studies, and clinical investigations revealed that omega-3 (PUFA), particularly Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), were found at great amounts in fish oil (Al-Daraji, et al., 2010).  Fish omega-3 FAs (namely EPA and DHA) possess a lot of properties that can explain their positive impact on cardiovascular events seen both in epidemiological and interventional studies. EPA and DHA differ in their ability to promote various effects of omega-3 FAs supplementation. Obviously, the two occur always together in natural sources – fish meals and fish oil. However, as highly purified EPA and DHA became available, evidence documenting individual effects of EPA and DHA has been accumulated (Vrablik, et al., 2009).

In general, fish oils are rich sources of omega-3FA and poor sources of omega-6, and the contents of linoleic acid (LA) are also low. The FA profile of the different oils varies with the time of year, the processing method and the predominant fish species from which they were extracted (Alparsan and Ozdogan, 2005). Many studies have examined the effects of dietary LC-PUFA, supplied as fish oil or fish meal on the FA composition of the broiler carcass (Nash, et al., 1995; Scaife, et al., 1994 and Lopez-Ferrer, 2001). Marine sources of long chain omega-3 fatty acids, offer the benefit of direct incorporation of long chain omega-3 fatty acids into eggs, which are metabolically more important than ALA for humans (Simopoulos, 2000).

Marketing trends in egg industry have centered on supplying the consumers with a low cholesterol product. The fatty acids composition of egg yolk is readily altered by dietary manipulation.  Recent evidence has suggested that incorporation of specific fatty acids (omega-3 fatty acids) into egg yolk may positively affect human plasma lipids, thus providing egg product of improved health quality (Hargis, Van Elswyk and Hagris (1991).

The purpose of this study is to investigate into the effect of supplementing layers diet with two levels of Marine and River Nile fishmeal (2 and 1% each), on egg yolk fatty acids profile and plasma lipids profile of layers.

Materials and Methods

The experiment was held in the Veterinary Research Institute (VRI) at Soba, from January to March 2010. The duration of the experiment was 8 weeks.                                                                                                                  Seven, full wire cages were made, each cage was (2 x 1.5 x 1 meter), and the capacity of each cage was 20 birds. The cages were placed in an open poultry house.

Hundred laying hens (Hisex breed), 20 weeks old, obtained from the Animal Production Research Centre (APRC) at Kuku, were used in this study. The birds were divided into five groups, 20 birds per treatment per cage.  The diets were formulated to meet the nutrients requirement of laying hens according to the recommendations of the National Research Council (NRC, 1994). Four formulae of diets were prepared by inclusion of, marine fishmeal (2%, 1%) (Group B and C resp.) and river Nile fishmeal (2%, 1%) (Group D and E resp.). Twenty kilogrammes of  marine  fish  were  brought  from Port Sudan, and twenty kilos of river fish were brought from a local fish market. Viscera and heads were removed, and then they were minced and sun-dried in an open yard. After that they were crushed down using electrical crusher. Each hen group received its experimental diet from day one. Drinking system contained two tanks for each cage, the tanks were cleaned, and the water was changed twice daily. Twenty eggs from each group; were collected randomly throughout the eighth week for egg yolk lipids profile. Egg was broken, the yolk was separated. Each two yolks were pooled together and placed into a glass container and stored at -20C until analysis. Three ml of blood were collected from seven birds of each group weekly, the blood was taken using a three ml syringe, and received into EDTA coated vials, the samples were centrifuged at 3000rpm, and plasma was transferred into plane vials. Plasma samples were stored at -20C until analysis. Lipids were extracted in chloroform-methanol (2:1 v/v) according to the method of Floch; et al., (1957). Methyl esters of the lipid extract were prepared according to Wang; et al., (2000). The analysis was performed using (2010, Shimadzu, Japan) gas chromatograph, fitted with Flame ionization detector (FID). Separation of fatty acids was achieved using DB-WAX column, serial number (US6551263 H), of 0.25um film thickness, 30 meter length and 0.25 mm inner diameter. Fatty acids methyl esters were identified by comparison of retention times with standards, and expressed as percentage of methyl esters. Table (3) and (4), shows the accumulative effect of feeding 2%and 1% marine  fishmeal and 

river Nile fishmeal on  egg  yolk  fatty acids content. The plasma lipids profile were determined using commercial kits by Unicam 8625 Spectrophotometer following the instructions of the manufacture, Table (5), shows the accumulative effect of feeding 2% and 1%  marine fishmeal and river Nile fishmeal on plasma lipids profile.

Statistical analysis was done using Analytical Software, (2008). Statistics (9). User’s Manual. Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL.

Table  1.   Experimental and control diet composition (%)

Diet/Feed ingredientA (Control)BCDE
  Sorghum  62.0  67.4  67.8  66.5  67.5
Ground nut cake19.011.412.012.012.0
Wheat bran3.53.43.43.73.7
Layer concentrate55555
Lime stone1010101010
Salt (Nacl)0.1250.1250.1250.125  0.125
Lysine Hcl (75%)0.10.10.10.10.1
Dl-Methionine0.10.10.10.10.1
Mycofix (Antimycotoxin)0.10.10.10.10.1
Biotronic (Acidifier)0.10.10.10.10.1
Marine fishmeal02      100
River Nile fishmeal00021
Total100100100100100

Table  2. Calculated chemical composition (%) of experimental and control

                diet.

Diet/ NutrientABCDE
  Crude Protein  18  17.75  17.5  18.2  18.0
Ether extract53.533.13.0
Crude Fiber444.13.33.3
Calcium4.14444
Total Phosphorous0.310.640.620.640.62
Methionine+cystine0.730.720.720.720.72
ME (Kcal/kg)28002750275327502753

Results

The accumulative effect of consuming different supplementary fishmeal sources in layers diet resulted in no significant difference in egg yolk saturated fatty acids content compared with the control group (Table 3). On the other hand, groups (E), (C), and (D), showed a significant (P<0.05) high levels of mono unsaturated fatty acids (MUSFA), compared to the control group (Table 4).

Group (B), which was fed 2% marine fishmeal, showed significant high levels of omega-3 fatty acids compared to all groups. Group (B), showed significant (P˂0.05) high levels of the total (PUSFA), compared to group (D), while group (C), (D) and (E); showed no significant difference between them. The control group showed a significant (P<0.05) low levels of the total unsaturated fatty acids (USFA), compared to group (B), (D) and (E), while group (C), which was fed 1 % marine fishmeal; showed the lowest levels of the total unsaturated fatty acids (USFA), among all experimental groups as well as the control group (A). Group (B), which was supplemented, by 2% marine    fishmeal;   showed   a    significant     (P˂0.01)    high      level      of

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), Docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) and Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), compared to all groups. These three very long chain poly unsaturated omega-3 fatty acids were not detected at all in the other groups. All groups deposited a significant (P<0.01) high level of linoleic acid (omega-6 FA), into their egg compared to the control group. Group (B), (C), (D), (E) and the control group (A), showed no significant different levels of Linolenic acid between them.  The control group (A), deposited a significant (p˂0.05) low levels of Oleic acid (omega-9 FA), compared to group (C), (D) and (E), on the other hand, the control group (A), showed a significant less levels of palmatic acid, compared to group (C) and (E). The control group (A), showed a significant (P˂0.01) less levels of Stearic acid, compared to all other groups.

Group (B), which was supplemented by 2% marine fishmeal, showed a significant (P˂0.05) high stearic acid levels compared to group (C), which was fed 1% marine fishmeal, tables (3) and (4).

Table (3) The effect of feeding different diet types on egg yolk fatty acids content %.

DHA %DPA %EPA %Arachidonic %Linolenic %Linoleic %Oleic %Stearic %Palmitic %Groups  
          
0.00 ± 0.032B0.00 ± 0.024B0.00 ± 0.071B0.00 ± 0.1587B0.00 ± 0.8327B0.00 ± 1.2633D35.11± 8.251B1.0222 ± 1.3269C21. 771 ± 4.9994BControl (A)
0.517± 0.032A0.677± 0.024A1.9416 ± 0.0716A0.1758 ± 0.1587AB0.4316 ± 0.8327B9.1662 ± 1.2633BC47.94± 8.25AB8.3796 ± 1.3269A30.766 ± 4.9994ABMarine fish 2% (B)
0.00 ± 0.032B0.00 ± 0.024B0.00 ± 0.0716B0.0492 ±  0.1587B0.00 ± 0.8327B8.9106 ± 1.2633BC52.13± 8.251A5.6320 ± 1.3269B33.286 ± 4.9994AMarine fish 1% (C)
0.00 ± 0.032B0.00 ± 0.024B0.00 ± 0.0716B0.1636 ±  0.1587AB0.0488 ± 0.8327B9.2680 ± 1.2633BC52.72± 8.251A7.6516 ± 1.3269AB30.219 ± 4.9994ABRiver fish 2% (D)
0.00 ± 0.03B0.00 ± 0.02B0.00 ± 0.071B0.00 ± 0.1587B0.00 ± 0.8327B7.6490 ± 1.2633C54.11± 8.251A5.7918 ± 1.326AB32.442 ± 4.9994ARiver fish 1 % (E)

Data are means ± standard error. Means in the same column followed by the same letters are not significantly different at (P<0.05).

Table 4.The accumulative effect of feeding different diet types on egg yolk content (%) of fatty

∑ Omega3  %∑ Poly unsaturated %C∑ Unsaturated    %∑ Saturated    %Group
0.00 ± 0.6172D   3.5682 ± 0.6172B     0.00 ±  0.6172D     0.0813 ± 0.6172D     0.00 ± 0.6172D    0.00 ±  1.5119D   12.910 ± 1.5119B     8.9106 ± 1.5119C     9.6200 ± 1.5119C     7.6490 ± 1.5119C    35.11± 1.7728A   47.945 ± 1.7728D     52.138 ± 1.7728BC     52.720 ± 1.7728BC     54.114 ± 1.7728B    58.517 ± 1.5430B   60.855 ± 1.5430AB     52.384 ± 1.5430C     62.345 ±  1.5430A     61.763 ± 1.5430AB    41.396 ± 1.7728A   39.145 ± 1.7728AB     40.296 ± 1.7728AB     37.871 ± 1.7728AB     38.234 ± 1.7728AB    Control (A)              Marine fishmeal 2% (B)   Marine fishmeal 1%  (C)   River fishmeal 2%  (D)   River fishmeal 1%  (E)

Data are means ± standard error. Means in the same column followed by the same letters are not significantly different at (P<0.05).∑SFA (Palmitic-Stearic), ∑MUSFA (Oleic), ∑PUSFA (Linoleic-linolenic-Archidonic-EPA-DPA-DHA). ∑ Omega-3 FA (Linolenic-EPA-DPA-DHA).

The control group (A), showed a significant (P˂0.01) high plasma triglycerides concentration compared to all treated groups. There was no significant difference between group (B) and (D), while group (B), showed a significant (P<0.01) low triglycerides compared to group (E).

The control groups (A), showed significant (P<0.01) high cholesterol concentration compared to all treated groups. Group (B) which supplemented by 2% marine fishmeal, recorded the lowest mean of plasma cholesterol 96.285±1.6620, (Table 5).

The control group (A), showed a significant (P<0.01) low level of plasma high density lipoprotein (HDL) compared to all treated groups, Group (B), which was supplemented by 2% marine fishmeal, recorded the highest level of plasma HDL The control group (A), also showed a significant (P<0.01) high concentration of plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) compared to all treated groups. There was no significant difference between group (C), which was fed 1% marine fishmeal, and group (E), which was fed 1% river fishmeal, also there was no significant difference between group (B), which received 2% marine fishmeal and group (D), which received 2% river fishmeal. The control group (A), also showed significant (P<0.01) high plasma total lipids compared to group (B), (C), (D) and (E), Table (5).

Table  5.  The accumulative effect of feeding 2% and 1% fish meal on plasma lipids (mg/dl) profile.

GroupTotal lipidsCholesterolTriglyceridesLDL-CholesterolHDL-Cholesterol
Control (A)592.7±10.247b124.28±1.7174b334.9±6.2518b  49.143±1.3356b9.13±0.8646b
Group (B)539.9±6.7631b96.285±2.5633b219.13±5.6656b32.0872.4580b18.945±1.4837b
Group (C)551.2±6.8057b99.765±3.0666b227.61±9.6551a36.263±1.4418b17.542±1.7090b
Group (D)542.6±7.4450b96.565±2.3489b219.72±3.9346b31.328±2.5293b18.303±1.5120b
Group (E)552.2±8.5976b99.725±3.7516b232.00±4.2121b36.147±1.9124b18.155±1.1258b

Data are means ± standard error. Means in the same columns followed by the same letters are not significantly different at (P˂0.05).

 

Discussion

The significant high levels of DHA, DPA and EPA, which were deposited in the egg yolk of hens fed 2% marine fishmeal (group B)  were also reported by (Gonzalez-Esquerra and Leeson, 2001). Menhadin oil, fishmeal and marine algae were frequently used by (Gonzalez-Esquerra and Leeson, 2001) to enrich egg yolk with EPA, DPA and DHA. In this study, similar results were obtained, when the layers fed 2% marine fishmeal (group B), they deposited high levels of DHA, DPA and EPA in their egg yolk.

Vertebrates lack delta-12 and delta-15 fatty acids desaturates responsible for converting oleic acid into linoleic acid and α-linolenic acid. Therefore, they are unable to biosynthesize poly unsaturated fatty acids de novo (Tinoco, 1982), and (Holman, 1986). So the long chain omega-3 fatty acids which were found in fish are actually obtained from marine algae. In group (D) layers which were fed 2% river fishmeal, there was no deposition of longer chain omega-3 fatty acids in their yolk, this could be probably to lack of algae or it could be that omega-3 fatty acids are available in trace amount undetectable by gas chromatograph analysis, also it could be due to difference between fish species that live in the sea and that live in river water, and may also be due to difference, in marine and fresh water algae constituent, perhaps marine algae are rich in long-chain omega-3 precursors than fresh water algae.

All four groups which fed fishmeal, showed a significant reduction of plasma total lipids, cholesterol, triglycerides and LDL-cholesterol concentrations; compared to the control group, while the HDL-cholesterol level was significantly increased, these findings agree with (AL-Sultan, 2005), who reported that feeding 1.5% and 3% of fish oil to laying hens resulted in low concentration of total lipids, cholesterol, triglycerides and LDL-cholesterol in plasma, while the concentration of HDL-cholesterol was significantly elevated. Simopoulos, (1991), studied the effect of dietary omega-3 fatty acids on factors and mechanisms involved in the development of inflammation, atherosclerosis and immune diseases; reported that; a reduction in LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides and an increase in levels of HDL-cholesterol. (Harris, and Connor, 1984), reported a reduction in LDL-cholesterol levels in normal subjects, fed diets containing fish oil as a source of omega-3 fatty acids, also there was low concentration of cholesterol and triglycerides. The same authors; justified the reduction of LDL-cholesterol in human subjects consuming diets rich in long chain omega-3 FA, from fish oil, or omega-6 FA, from vegetables oils may be due to a reduction in LDL-cholesterol synthesis, an increased fractional rate of catabolism of LDL, or combination of both. 

References

Al-Daraji, Hazim J., Al-Mashadani H.A., Al-Hayani W.K., Mirza H.A. and Al-Hassani A.S.  (2010). Effect of Dietary Supplementation with

Different Oils on Productive and       Reproductive Performance of Quail. International Journal of Poultry Science 9 (5): 429-435.

Alparsan G.  and  Ozdogan M. (2005). The effects of diet containing fish oil

on some blood parameters and the performance values of broilers and cost efficiency. Int. J. Poultry Sci. 5: 415-419.

Al-Sultan  S.I. (2005).  Effect of dietary fish oil on production traits and lipid

composition of laying hens. International Journal of Poultry Science 4 (8): 586-588.

Analytical  Software, (2008). Statistic (9). User’s Manual. Analytical         Software, Tallahassee, FL.P. 454.

Ferrier,  Les K.,  Caston, Linda. J.,  Leeson Steve Squire,  James Weaver,

Bonni. J. and  Holub, Bruce. J (1995). α linoleinic acid- and docosahexanoeic acid enriched eggs from hens fed          Flaxseed: influence on blood lipids and platelet phospholipids fatty acids in human, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 62 (1): 81-86.

Folch  J.,  Lees M.  and  Sloane-Stanely  G. H. (1957). A simple method for

the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. (226): 497–507.

Gonzalez-Esquerra  R.  and  Leeson S.  (2001). Alternatives for enrichment

of eggs and chicken    meat with omega-3 fatty acids. Poultry Science. 81: 295-305.

Hargis,  P. S., Van elswyk;  M. E.   and    Hargis;  B. M.   (1991).   Dietary

modification of yolk lipids with menhaden oil. Poultry Science (70): 874-883.

Harris, Illingworth, Ws.  and   Connor,  W. E.  (1984).  Inhibition   of   low

density lipoprotein      synthesis by dietary omega-3 fatty acids in humans. Journal of American Heart             Association (4): 270-275.

Holman,  R. T.  (1986).  Control   of  polyunsaturated acids  in  tissue   lipids.

            Journal of the American College of Nutrition, (5), Issue 2: 183-211.

Lopez-Ferrer. S., Baucells, M. D., Barroeta,  A. C.  and  Grashorrt, M. A.

(2001). n-3 enrichment of chicken meat.1. Use of very long chain fatty acids in chicken diets and their influence on meat quality: fish oil. Poultry Science (80): 741-752.

Mary,  E. Van elswyk,  M.E. (1997). Comparison of n-3 fatty acid sources in

laying hen rations for improvement of whole egg nutritional quality: A review. British Journal of Nutrition, 78,Suppl. (1): S61-S69.

Nash D.M., Hamilton R. M., Sanford K. A  and  Hulan H. W.  (1995). The

effect of dietary menhaden meal and storage on the omega-3 fatty acid and sensory attributes of egg yolk in laying hens. Can. J. Anim. Sci. (76): 377-383.

NRC (1994). National Research Council. Nutrient Requirement of Poultry.

            9th. edn. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.

Scaife,  J. R.;  Moyo,   J. , Galbraith,  H.,  Michie, W.   and  Campbell,  V.

(1994). Effect of different dietary supplemental fats and oils on the tissue fatty acid composition and             growth of female broiler. Brit. Poult. Sci. (35):107–118.

Simopoulos, A. P. (2000).  Symposium: role of  poultry products in enriching

the human diet with    n-3 PUFA. Human requirement for n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Poult. Sci. (79): 961–970.

Simopoulos,  A. P. (1991).  Omega-3 fatty  acids  in  health  and  disease  and

growth and development, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (54): 438-463.

Tinoco, J. (1982).  Dietary requirements and functions of alpha-linolenic acid

            in animals. Progress in lipids Research (1): 1-45.

Vrablik,  M.  Prusikova, M.   Snejdrlova, M. and  Zlatohlavek,  L. (2009).

Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Do We Understand the Relationship?, Physiol. Research (58): S19-S26.

Wang,  Y.  Sunwoo,  H.   Cherian,  G.1.  and  Sim,  J.S.  (2000).  Fatty acid

determination in chicken egg yolk. A comparison of different methods. Poultry Science (79): 1168–1171.

Authors

Sara Ahmed Mohamed

Mohamed Alshiekh Barri

Ibrahim Ismaeil Hamid

Salwa Mohamed Elbashier Khojali

أثر مصادر مختلفة من مسحوق السمك على تكوين الاحماض الدهنية فى صفار البيض وتكوين الدهون في البلازما فى الدجاج البياض

ساره أحمد محمد1, محمد الشيخ برى1, سلوى محمد البشير خوجلى1 وإبراهيم إسماعيل حامد2

1 معهد البحوث البيطرية – سوبا

2 مركز بحوث الانتاج الحيواني- كوكو

الملخص:

تم اجراء هذه التجربة لمعرفة اثر إضافة مسحوق السمك البحري والنيلي بمقدار 1 و 2% لكل على حدة في عليقة تقليدية للدجاج البياض  على تركيبة الأحماض الدهنية في صفار البيض و تركيبة الدهون فى بلازما الدم في الدجاج البياض. استخدمت 100 دجاجة بياضة من سلاللة (الهايسكس) عمر 20 اسبوع فى هذه الدراسة.  أظهرت تغذية  الدجاج البياض لمدة شهرين علي ان اضافة مسحوق السمك أثر معنويا علي محتوي صفار البيض من الاحماض الدهنية الغير مشبعة . كما أدت إضافة مسحوق السمك لعليقة الدجاج البياض الى انخفاض في مستوي كل من الدهون الكلية للبلازما, الجلسريدات الثلاثية, الكلسترول والبروتينات الدهنية  منخفضة الكثافة, بينما ارتفعت البروتينات الدهنية عالية الكثاقة.

Download As PDF


Subscribe to our Newsletter

[email-subscribers-form id="1"]
All Rights Reserved, Animal Production Research Center © 2020 | Prepared by: Dr. Muhammad Ahmad Al-Khalifa | Design: Mohamed Ahmed