0911111111

The influence of Calving season on the productive performance of Kenana cows in the Gezira Scheme, Sudan

0 Comments

Mahassin A. Mohamed1, Y. A. Hassan,2 K. A. Gubartalla2 and  Rasha S. Shereif2

1Shukaba Animal Resources Research Station, Sudan

2 Animal Production Research Centre, P.O. Box 1355, Kuku, Khartoum north, Sudan

Summary

198 multiparious Kenana cows’ records were used to study the effect of calving season on some production traits. Cows were similar in live weight: (300kg), and age between 3-5th parity, belonged randomly to herds in four villages in the Gezira scheme. The traits chosen were total lactation yield, daily yield, lactation length, dry period and calving interval. Results obtained, respectively were: 852.9 ± 91.8 Kg, 3.9 ± 0.59 Kg, 249.9 ±10.23 days, 216.9 ±16.8 days, and 461.1 ±11.77 days. The study revealed no seasonal variations among the traits investigated (p>0.05). Instead, cows calved in wet summer were proven to an overall better performance, in terms of  high lactation and daily yield in a longest milking duration, with a correspondingly shortest days dry and calving interval, in contrast to the other seasons.

Introduction

Indigenous (Bos indicus) cattle have a low response capability to incremental inputs for increased milk production, and that milk production in tropical cattle often ceases several months before the subsequent calving, and before the depressant effect of gestation on milk production is noticeable, (Wilson 1987). Therefore, length of lactation is not so much influenced by calving interval. Contemporary, the lactation length of temperate breeds is completely determined by the length of calving interval, (Bastos 1989). Season of calving had been recognized as an important factor affecting milk production in dairy cows. Certain seasons appear to sustain good lactation, due to favourable climatic conditions, (El Amin, 1969).

The objectives of this study were to assess the effect of season of calving on the production performance of Kenana cows in the Gezira scheme.

Materials and Methods

Animals

The study was undertaken in the Gezira scheme during (1990/91), and involved 198 milking multiparious Kenana cows with a similar liveweight ± 300 Kg, and average age between 3-5th  parity were derived randomly from eight cattle herds, located in four villages; at longitude 33º  20´ E, and latitude 14º  20´ N.

Housing

Cows were kept in traditionally earth-bedded yards, bounded with no-shaded thorny acacia shrubs.

Management

Feeding system in the Gezira depends mainly on the grazing resources provided by the natural grasses during the rainy season, and the crops residues after harvesting the Sorghum grain (October-November); Groundnut, Wheat and Cotton during March-May .Some crop residues are preserved, and fed during feed scarcity. A limited green fodder and concentrate meal composed of some crushed sorghum grain, Wheat bran and Groundnut or Cottonseed cake feeding, was practiced by some farmers; and are offered before or during milking time. Cows were milked once per day, traditionally with the means of their calf’s presence. Cessation of lactation coincides with the calf weaning.

Data collection and manipulation

Calving and dry dates were registered regularly. Daily milk yield was recorded by using one-kilogramme, and a half-kilogramme measuring cups. From these data, total and daily yields, lactation length, dry period and calving interval were computed. The seasons of the year have been classified into: wet summer (July-October), winter (November-February), and dry summer (March-June).

Statistical analysis 

The data were analyzed according to Freese (1980), using Least-square means and standard errors. Analysis of variance was performed in accordance the following model:   ;  where;  Y= Studied trait: ( Total yield , daily yield, lactation length, dry period and calving interval, µ = Mean effect, and α = Error effect.

Results

Table 1 shows an overall lactation yield and daily yield of 852.9± 91.8 and 3.9±0.59 Kg in 249.9± 10.23 days. The table also depicts an overall dry period and calving interval of 216.9± 16.8, and 461.1± 11.77 days, respectively; regardless the insignificant (P> 0.05) effect of calving season upon the traits investigated. Table 1, again indicated the superiority of the wet summer calving cows, by gaining the maximum contribution on total lactation yield of 952± 95.60 Kg, and on daily yield of 4.4± 0.64 Kg, that was associated with the longest milking duration of  270.7± 11.0 days, but with correspondingly shortest days dry of 198.3± 19.7, and calving interval of 459.2± 10.2 days. The least values of total and daily yield of, 796.4± 89.0, and 3.4± 0.53 Kg, were recorded by the dry summer calving cows that sustained the shortest milking duration, of 233.8± 0.89 days, and the longest respective days dry and calving interval, of 240.3± 13.8, and 464.5± 12.7 days. The winter calving cows were shown, to maintain the intermediate values of total and daily yields of, 809.8± 90.8, and 4.0± 0.59 Kg, in 245.3± 10.8 days, together with 212.1± 16.9 days dry, and calving interval of 459.6 days.

Discussion

El Habeeb 壯陽藥 (1991) demonstrated a lactation yield and daily yield in a Kenana herd of 1599.73± 50.2 and 6.1± 1.7 Kg in 262.13± 5.5 days. Variable results of 852.20± 91.8 and3.9± 0.5 Kg in 249.9± 10.2 days, were displayed by the Kenana in the current study, (Table 1) .It was suggested that the Zebu cattle, like the Kenana, are characterized by too short lactations (ElAmin, 1969).

Table 1. Means ± standard error of milk production traits by calving seasons of Kenana cows in Gezira scheme

Season / ParameterWet summerWinterDry summerOverall mean
Total milk yield (kg)952.5±95.5809.8±90.8796±89.0852.9±91.8
Daily milk yield (kg)4.4±0.644.0±0.593.4±0.533.9±0.50
Lactation length (days)270.7±11.0245.3±10.8233.8±0.89249.9±10.3
Dry period (days)198.3±19.7212.1±16.9240.3±13.8216.9±16.8
Calving interval (days)459.2±10.6459.6±12.0464.5±12.7461.1±11.77

Relevant results were shown by Mohamed (1991), for the same breed in the Gezira. This lower productivity might be associated with the long term nutritional stress during the dry summer months, as well as the milking practices adopted in the area which would ultimately impair the expression of the milking potential of the Kenana in the Gezira.

Many reports proposed an essential role of calving season on milk production traits, of these: Ageeb and Hillers (1991) showed that the Sudanese wet summer calving cows gave better yield and had the longest milking period. Amasaib et al., (2008) also, confirmed such results. On the contrary, the present investigation results revealed no seasonal variations (P> 0.05), among the traits studied, (Table 1). Despite of this, the wet summer calving cows showed an overall better performance, due to that calving took place concomitantly with the fresh sprouting grasses that led to the marked increases in milk production and lactation length. FadelMoula (1994) obtained contrasting results, who denoted, that dry summer calving cows were more superior in milk production. Osman (1972) stated several possible reasons for the lack of the pronounced seasonal effects; (i).The low inherent productivity of the indigenous cattle makes them unable to produce more milk even under improved feeding.  (ii).Cows eats more or grazes selectively to compensate for the poor quality of the grass during the dry season. (iii).Cows can yield this lower quantity of milk at the expense of their body reserves.

Research work evaluating the dry period, in dairy cows suggests an optimal of 2-month period (Yousif 1994). Optimal length may vary depending on parity, calving interval and level of milk production (Grummer and Rastani 2004). Alim (1960), in previous findings of Kenana cattle at Wad Medani reported a 164 days dry period.  Concurrently, the present trait indicated an excessively longer period of 216.9± 16.8 days (table 1), that was not affected by calving season, (P> 0.05). Moreover, the dry summer calving cows were shown to attain the longest duration of days dry of 240.3± 14.8 days. These cows were expected to face increasing climatic and nutritional stresses exhibited by the hot weather that brings about a curtailing of their lactations, as supported by Kiwuawa et al., (1983) findings.

The calving interval of dairy cows has been an area of research for the past several years. At Umbanein station, Wilson et al., (1987) reported of the Kenana, a calving interval of 530 days, which is higher than the average value obtained in the present study. Cilek (2009) reported a significant season effect on Holstein Friesian’s calving interval. Inconsistent results were shown by the Sudanese cross-bred cows, as demonstrated by Mohsen (2000), that agree with the results of this study, (P> 0.05). Moreover, Khalafalla (1977) found no seasonal effects on calving interval in a herd of Kenana cattle. In disagreement, results in the current study showed that cows calving in the dry summer had; though non-significantly (P>0.05), the longest calving interval compared with other seasons. These discrepancies had been attributed by Musa (2001), to the management practices, and or genetic constitutions of the different herds, and sampling effects associated with unadjusted records that could be another cause.

In conclusion, with regards to this study, the current data were statistically similar, and proposed no seasonal variations among the productive traits investigated.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Mr. John Norris, then, the co-coordinator of the Irish Aid, for fully funding this study. Deepest thanks to the Veterinarians Osman Yousif and Imad Khalid. Thanks are also extended to the Technicians Abdalla Ahmed and Hamid Abdeen, and finally to the car driver Hassan Mohamed Ali, and The Animals’ Owners for their generous assistance and care shown at carrying out this work.

 

References

Alim, K. A. (1960). Reproductive rate and milk yield of Kenana cattle in the

            Sudan. J. Agric. Sci.   Camb. 55: 183.

Ageeb,  A.G., and  Hillers J. K. (1991). Effects of  crossing  local   Sudanese

Cattle with British Friesianon performance traits. Bull. Anim. Hlth. Prod. Afr. 39 (1): 69.

Amasaib, A. M., AbuNikhaila, A. M., Fadel Seed, A. N. M. and Mohamed

H. E. (2008).   Effect of season of calving on some productive traits in pure and crossbred cattle in the Sudan. Res. J. of Dairy Sci. 2 (1): 5.

Bastos,  J. F. P. (1989). Genetic and  non-genetic  factors affecting milk yield

and lactation length in a herd of Guzera cows. Arquivo Brasilerio de Medicina e Zootecnica. 41: 185-187; Cited,      Anim. Breed. Abstr. 58: 82.

Cilek,  S. (2009).  Reproductive traits  of  Holstein cows raised at Polati Farm

            in Turkey. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 8: 1.

El Amin, F. M. (1969).  Environmental   and    genetic    factors    influencing  

reproduction  and milk production of Sudanese indigenous dairy cattle. M. V. Sc. thesis, University of Khartoum, Sudan.

El Habeeb,  E. A.   (1991).  Variation  in  reproductive  and  milk  production

traits in Butana and Kenana dairy cattle in the Sudan. M.Sc. thesis, University of Khartoum, Sudan.

Fadel Moula,  A. A.  (1994).  Factors affecting  reproductive  and  productive 

performance of crossbred dairy cattle in the Sudan. M.V. Sc. thesis, University of Khartoum, Sudan.

Freese, F. (1980). Elementary Statistical Methods for Foresters. Agriculture          Hand Book- 317. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington. P.

            28.

Grummer,  R.R.  and  Rastani,  R. R.  (2004).  Why  re-evaluate  dry period

            length. J. Dairy Sci. 87: 77.

Khalafalla,   A. M.   (1977).   The   reproductive  performance  in  a  herd   of

Kenana cattle (Northern Sudan Zebu). M. V. Sc. thesis. University of  Khartoum, Sudan.

Kiwuwa, G. H., Trial, J. C. M., Kurtu, M. Y.,  Getach Worku,  Anderson,

F. M.  and  Jefery Durkin (1983). Crossbred dairy cattle productivity in Arsi region, Ethiopia Res. Rept. No.11, ILCA- Addis Abba, Ethiopia.

Mohamed,  Mahassin A. (1991).  Productive  Performance   of   dairy   cows   

under  the  Gezira prevailing conditions. Sudan J. Anim. Prod. 4(2): 95.

Mohsen,  G. S. (2000).  Effects   of   managerial  factors  on lactation yield at

            Belgravia Dairy Farm. M. Sc. thesis. University of Khartoum, Sudan.

Musa, L. M. A. (2001).  Genetic  and  environmental  influences in  a herd of

            Butana cattle. M. Sc. Thesis, University of Khartoum.

Osman, A. H. (1972).  Studies on Sudanese indigenous cattle. Environmental

factors influencing reproductive  rates and milk production under range conditions. Trop. Agric. (Trindad). 49 (2): 143-150.

Wilson,   R. T.,   Ward,   P.N.,  Saeed,  A. M.  and  Light, D.  (1987).  Milk

production characteristics of   Kenana breed of Bos indicus in the Sudan. J. Dairy Sci. 70: 2673.

Yousif,   G. M.  (1995).   Effect  of   peripartum  dietary  energy  density  and  

protein  content  on peripartum body fat mobilization, milk yield, health performance and protein turnover in       Holstein cows. M. Sc. thesis. Michigan State University, U.S.A.

Authors:

Mahassin Abdel Razig Mohamed

Yassir Ahmed Hassan

Kamal Abd Elwhab Gubartalla

Rasha Subhi Sherief.

أثر الموسم علي الخصائص الإنتاجية لأبقار الكنانة في الجزيرة

محاسن عبد الرازق محمد ، ياسر احمد حسن ، كمال عبد الوهاب جبارة الله  ورشا صبحي شريف

الملخص:

          شملت هذه الدراسة 198 رأسآ من أبقار الكنانة ذات الولادات المتعددة متماثلة في الوزن ±300 كجم والعمر (3-5 ولادات) تتبع لثماني قطعان تنحدر عشوائيآ لأربع قري بمنطقة مشروع الجزيرة لدراسة أثر فصل الولادة علي بعض الصفات الإنتاجية لأبقار الحليب المتمثلة في الإنتاج الموسمي ، الحليب اليومي ، طول فترة الإدرار ، طول فترة الجفاف وطول الفترة مابين الولادتين. وقد خلصت الدراسة ترتيبيآ علي النتائج الآتية:- 852.9±91.8 كيلوجرام ، 3.9±0.59 كيلوجرام ، 249.9±10.23 يوم ، 216.9±16.8 يوم ، 461.1±11.77 يوم .

          أظهرت الدراسة أثرآ غير معنويآ لفصل الولادة علي الصفات المدروسة (P>0.05) وبالرغم من ذلك تميزت الأمهات الوالدة خلال فصل الخريف بالاداء الجيد للصفات المدروسة مقارنة بولادات الفصول الأخري .

Download As PDF


Subscribe to our Newsletter

[email-subscribers-form id="1"]
All Rights Reserved, Animal Production Research Center © 2020 | Prepared by: Dr. Muhammad Ahmad Al-Khalifa | Design: Mohamed Ahmed