0911111111

Growth performance, feed intake and nutrient digestibility by Western Baggara cattle fed sorghum stover with different levels of concentrate.

0 Comments

A.E. El Tayeb, T.A. Mohamed and H.K. Mohammed

Institute of Animal Production, University of Khartoum, P.O. Box 32,
Khartoum North, Sudan.

SUMMARY

Twenty-four Western Baggara bulls averaging 313.5± 0.15 Kg were stratified according to body weight into four groups and then allotted randomly to four treatments. Bulls in treatment I were fed ad libitum on concentrate mixture (CM) plus 1 kg of sorghum stover. Bulls in treatments 2, 3 and 4 were fed ad libitum on sorghum stover plus 75, 65 and 55% of ad libitum CM, respectively for 8 weeks. Average daily gain was comparable among treatments (P>0.05). Dry matter intake and feed conversion ratio progressively increased (P<0.05) as the amount of CM offered was decreased. Intakes of dry matter (kg) and feed conversion ratio were 9.5, 8.6; 9.7, 10.8; 10.5, 9.5 and 10.5, 9.5 for bulls given the CM ad libitum, 75, 65 and 55% of ad libitum  CM, respectively. Apparent digestibilities of dry matter, organic matter and protein were greater (P<0.05) for bulls fed ad libitum, and 75% of ad libitum. CM.than for those fed 65 and 55% of ad libitum CM. Digestibilities of ether extract, acid detergent fibre and gross energy were not significantly affected (P>0.05) by dietary treatments.


INTRODUCTION

In Sudan, animals are finished on purchased feeds, mainly concentrates (sorghum grains and cotton seed cakes). The most important concentrate used in beef cattle finishing diets is sorghum grain (dura) which is the basal diet of most of sudanese peaple and major source of energy- to other mono-gastric animals, particularly poultry. Fortunately, ruminants possess the rumen microbes which enable them to extract energy from fibrous feeds. Therefore, the inclusion of roughages in ruminant diets will spare the cereal grains, the production of which is declining in Sudan, for man and other monogastrics. Hence, attention has been directed towards the use of sorghum stover in finishing diets of beef cattle.

The objectives of this research were to determine the growth responses, dry matter intake and digestibility of nutrients by beef cattle fed sorghum stover with different levels of concentrate mixture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental Animals:

The cattle used in the study were entire males ranging from 2 to 5 years in agQ and belonging to the Western Baggara type of cattle. Twenty four bulls (averaging 313.5±0.15 kg) were involved in the experiment. The cattle were vaccinated before. the beginning of the experiment against anthrax, rinder-pest and black quarter, and were treated against intestinal worms and ticks with Thiabendazole, and Gamatox, respectively On entrance to the feed-lot site, the cattle were

branded, weighed and divided according to weight into four experimental groups of six animals each. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups of 3 animals. Each subgroup was kept in a pen of 3.8 x 3.2 m.

Feeds and Feeding:

The experimental feeds consist of a concentrate mixture (table 1) and unprocessed sorghum stover. The four groups of animals were assigned randomly to one of the following diet treatments: (1) as libitum feeding on concentrate mixture (CM) plus 1.0 kg sorghum stover, (2) ad libitum feeding on sorghum stover plus 75% of a libitum CM (3) ad libitjim feeding on sorghum stover plus 65% of ad libitum CM and (4) ad, libitum feeding on sorghum stover plus 55% of ad, libitum CM. Animals were adapted to feed for 12 days. The experimental feeding period continued for 8 weeks. The feed was offered at 8:00 a.m. Refusals were collected the next morning and daily feed intake recorded. Animals were weighed on weekly basis. Water was available to animals all the time.

Digestibility Trial:

Twelve bulls three out of each diet treatment were utilized in digestibility trials to determine digestibilities of diets used in the feeding trial. Each bull was placed in a separate pen. The pen’s floor was made of concrete and levelled in such a way to make urine pass without contaminating the faeces. Because animals were involved in the feeding trail, only three days were allowed for adjustment to diets. This adjustment period was followed by 5 days collection period.

Chemical A nalysis:

Feed and faecal samples were analysed for dry matter (DM) crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE) and ash according to AOAC 1980). Acid detergent fibre (ADF) and lignin were determined by Goering and

Van Soest (1970). Nutrient apparent digestion coefficients were determined by the whole collection method (Mc Donald et al. 1980). Gross energy was determined using a bomb calorimenter (Parr Instrument Co., Moline, IL. 61265, USA)

Statistical Analysis:

All data were analysed statistically by ANOVA for a randomized complete-block design (Steel and Torrie, 1980). Differences between sets of treatment means were assessed by the least significant difference method (Steel and Torrie, 1980).

RESULTS

Animal Performance:

Animal performance data are presented in Table 2. Dry matter intake progressively increased (P<0.05) as the amount of CM offered was decreased. Final body weight was comparable among dietary treatments. There were no differences (P>0.05) among treatment groups in average daily gain. The feed conversion ratio was significantly lower (P<0.05) for bulls offered the CM ad libitum than for bulls offered the other treatments. Bulls given the CM at the 65 and 55% level showed significantly better (P<0.05) feed conversion efficiency than those given the CM at the 75% level.

Apparent Digestibility:

Digestion coefficients for DM, OM and CP were highest on diet
treatment (1), and tended to decline as the proportion of concentrate in

the diet decreased from 100% concentrate to 55% of ca iibitum  roughage intake (P<0.05). Digestion coefficients for EE, ADF and energy were not significantly different in the four diet treatments (P>0.05).


DISCUSSION

In this study, the incorporation of sorghum stover in beef cattle diets up to 45% had no undersirable effects (P>0.05) on average daily gain. With respect to this parameter, bulls given the all-concentrate diet and those given the sorghum stover up to 45% were comparable. In contrast to this work, Devendra and Raghavan (1978) presented data which indicated that cereal straws in fattening diets should not exceed 20 to 30%. However, this discrepancy may be due mainly to the quality of the crop residue used in the two studies. Another factor which may have contributed to the better performance of the bulls used in this study was the relatively high levels of protein in the diets.

Bulls offered the sorghum stover in their diets consumed significantly greater (P <0.05) dry matter per day than those offered the all-concentrate diet. The sorghum stover consumption was significantly increased (P<0.05) when the proportion of the concentrate mixture in the diet decreased. This agrees with previous studies (Levy a al. 1975; Horten and Holmes, 1976; Lofgreen et al. 1981) which have demonstrated, from studies with beef cattle, that dry matter consumption increased as a result of decreasing concentrate allowance.

The inclusion of unprocessed sorghum stover in the diets had significant (P<0.05) effect on feed utilization. The feed conversion ratio was significantly lower (P<0.05) for bulls offered the highest level of concentrate mixture. This agrees with Wise flat., (1968) and El Hag and Mukhtar (1978) who observed improved feed utilization as the level of concentrate in the diet was replaced with roughage. In the present study, the higher feed conversion ratio for bulls fed the 75%

concentrate mixture was unexpected. However, this was due to the
slightly lower growth rates exhibited by bulls given that diet compared

with bulls given the latter diets.

Incorporation of sorghum stover in finishing diets resulted in a reduction (P<0.05) in digestibility of dry matter, organic matter and crude protein. The significant reduction in the digestion coefficients of these parameters may be due to low content of protein in the diets, leading to decreased activity of microflora. This is in agreement with Lyons gt al. (1970) who showed that an increase in the crude protein level of the diet resulted in an increase of digestibility of organic matter and crude protein. More over, McDonald Et al (1980) have shown that the digestibility of crude protein is particularly dependent upon the proportion of protein in the diet. Also, another factor which may have resulted in the observed reduction of digestibility of diets containing the sorghum stover could be related to the level of feed consumption which was highest (P<0.05) for bulls fed the 65 and 55% of the concentrate mixture ad libitum.

It is interesting to note that, in Sudan, the sorghum stover is fairly cheap compared to concentrate feed stuffs (sorghum grains and cotton seed cake). The prices of ingredients of the experimental diets and cost of finishing beef cattle are given in Tables 4 and 5, respectively. The increase in the price of the concentrate diet was due to the high cost per ton of the sorghum grains. The inclusion of the sorghum stover in the diets reduced their cost. The percentages reduction were 16.8, 23.6 and 40.3 when the sorghum stover constituted 25,35, and 45% of the diet. Incorporation of sorghum stover in the diet at the high levels (35 and 45%) reduced the cost of finishing when compared to the all-concentrate and the low level sorghum stover feeding. Similarly, Mohamed Salih (1986) and El Hzg and Kurdi (1986) have demonstrated, with beef cattle similar to those used in this study, a reduction in cost of finishing as a result of sorghum stover incorporation in the diet.


REFERENCES

A.O.A.C. (1980). Official Methods of analysis (13th. ed.). Association of Official Analystical Chemists, Washington, D.C.

Devendra, C. and Raghaven, G.V. (1978). Agricultural by-products in South-East Asia: Availability, utilization and potential value. World Rev. Anim. Prod. 14:11-17.

El Hag, G.A. and Mukhtar, A.M.S. (1978) Varying levels of concentrate in the rations of Sudan desert sheep World Rev. Anim. Prod. 16 (4) : 73-79.

El Hag, M.G. and Kurdi, O.I. (1986). Prospects for efficient utilization of agrb-industrial by – products and crop residues for ruminant feeding in Sudan with emphasis on qualification nutritional composition, constraints and research results. ARNAB. Towards optimal feeding of agricultural by-products to livestock in Africa. Proceeding of a workshop held at the University of Alexandria, Egypt October, 1985. ILCA, Addis-Ababa, Ethiopia.

Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P.J. (1970). Forage Fibre Analysis (Apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agric. Handbook 379 ARS, USDA, Washington, D.C.

Horton, G.M.J. and Holmes, W. (1976). A note on the influence of a supplement on barely straw by cattle. Anim. Prod. 22: 419-421.

Levy, D., Holzer, Z. and Folman, Y. (1975). Effect of concentrate roughage ratio on the production of beef from Israeli-Friezian bulls slaughtered at different liveweights. Anim. Prod. 20 : 199-205.

Lofgreen, G.P., El Tayeb, A.E. and Kiesling, H.E. (1981). Millet and alfalfa hays alone or in combination with high energy diet for receiving stressed calves. J. Anim. Sci. 52: 959.

Lyons, T.P. Caffrey and Connel, W.J. (1970). The effect of energy, protein and vitamin supplementation on the performance and voluntary intake of barely straw by cattle. Anim. Prod. 12:323-334.

McDonald, P., Edwards, R.A. and Greenhalgh, J.F.D. (1980). Animal Nutrition. Longman, London and New York.

Mohammed Salih, G.M. (1986). Effect of sorghum straw feeding on feedlot performance of cattle. M.V.Sc. Thesis, University of Khartoum.

Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. (1980). Principles and procedures of statistics (2nd. ed) McGraw-Hill Book, Co., New York.

Wise, M.B., Harvey, R.W. Haskins, B.R. and Barrik, E.R. 1968. Finishing beef cattle on all-concentrate rations J. Anim Sci. 27 : 1449 – 1455.

Download As : PDF


Subscribe to our Newsletter

[email-subscribers-form id="1"]
All Rights Reserved, Animal Production Research Center © 2020 | Prepared by: Dr. Muhammad Ahmad Al-Khalifa | Design: Mohamed Ahmed